But they did not let me say, because they take discrimination VERY seriously in the Vereniging Tot Instandhouding van het complex Tuinwijk-zuid te Haarlem, meaning: they do A LOT of it.
You have two choices:
-come to court against me,
if you win I will appeal,
if I win but not the way I want I will appeal,
if I win the way I want the second proceeding will start: DAMAGES!!
Meanwhile: you will be under the public light;
I will use every possible channel to bring what happens here to the national and international attention,
(note not included in the original speech: so in a way mr. De Vries is right, and I do seek publicity but for the scandal of discrimination and autoctonicity (“we are right because we’re from here! Protect the tribe!”) this association represents, and which needs to be brought to light, my name does not really have nor will have any relevance here, what publicity will I get? Who remembers the name of the documentary’s director?) :
we are a national monument, worth roughly 100M euros;
and the association of owners instead of providing the needed maintenance discriminate and try to bully those who ask for it;
Who simply ask for and finally execute the democratically chosen actions one to be executed. (additional note: and for which we have paid and we pay for every month!!)
You regularly lie to members, to the authorities (which do not seem to mind too much) and in every possible way try to never talk about it because it is not “chic”.
And, as Professor Louise says in 2022, it’s not Haarlem, we don’t do it like this here, het hoort niet.
We are an asset of public relevance, there is no “privacy law” to hide behind here, this IS a social context and it IS of broader relevance.
The information I will disclose have paramount value for the general public, which possible future members belong to.
Translated: the real estate value you might possibly loose will be saved by others and the difference being: your real estate value is based on lies hence it has no reason to be, it is a distortion of the market, mr. De Vries.
Coming next: the wrongdoings within this association of Mvr. Van Zetten, prof. Van Doorn and mvr. Groot.
Because of their relevant public roles, their actions will be brought to public first and at any cost.
I will begin with mvr. Van Zetten, newly re-elected in the Haarlem Council.
She can expect 4 years of solid opposition from me. Every public step, every declaration, every session of this racist, antidemocratic, autoctonic wannabe”Kenau” who is also a supporter of Israel for good measure, nothing is ever too much for Prof. Louise, will be analyzed, every contradiction and selfish interest brought to light.
Mvr. Groot and Prof. Van Doorn will be dealt shortly afterwards.
The association will FURTHER change, mark my words.
A brief recap: Welna is gone, Ellen is gone, Munnik is gone, Van Zetten influence brought to none.
She asked to “discipline me” 4 years ago and again 2 years ago, and here you are meaning: YOU are in court with ME. Brought by me, for violation of the civil code, not exactly peanuts.
The association IS changing but needs a more structural one (huishoudelijk reglement, anyone??): external board, indipendent bookeeping, total transparency: all the bills online, all the meeting (board and members) fully recorded, transcribed and summarized online.
All the maintenance plans made well in advance, voted for the current year for the next one, things like this.
You can do it under the bombs or you can choose the second option:
-cover all my legal expenses, so far, around 22,000 euros but I forecast a bit more will be needed.
-compensate me for my troubles: I asked previously 1000 euros per unit but I do not want to give the impression to be doing this for money,
– let’s make it 100 euros per unit. Not negotiable. And you will pay also my quota.
Then: fire this board, you might even re-elect them later, if you like them SO much!
But first: publish a letter of apology on our website and keep it on the home page for two years and then to be saved on the server in secula seculorum.
And draft with me a plan to re-established full legitimacy of the status of this monument, in full compliant with the laws, with a statute which foresee clearly what are the duties of this association and how are they going to be fullfilled (after 30 years we are still discussing what is to be billed to residents and what to the association!!!SPLITSAKTE NOW!!), a real huishoudelijk reglement, serious transparency instead of hollow self-celebration.
The choice is yours, mediation will be in 15 days.
A note: no other member, here, speaks while other members are holding the watch in their hands. You think that because you don’t want to talk about things these are going to simply gonna go away? How is it going so far?
For me good, the gardens start to look like someone is taking care of them, I like it.
Leave a Reply